| State of the University
2002 - Page 1
State
of the University Speech
February 5, 2002
Eric R. Gilbertson, President
Saginaw Valley State University
Home
| Next
A sizeable and
enthusiastic crowd was once gathering for a speech by the President
of the United States it was Herbert Hoover, I think
and Will Rogers was reported to have observed, with mock incredulity,
that it was almost as if people actually believed the President
had something to do with running the Country. I am soberly aware
that the important work of the University is carried out in arenas
remote from the third floor of Wickes Hall, but I hope our discussion
today can help to put that work in a context.
A sense of confusion
and vulnerability still lingers throughout our Land and we
and our University are very much a part of this Land. It has to
do with terrorism; it likely has something to do with the state
of our economy; it may also be that events have caused us to re-examine
matters we thought were settled or question things we believed were
true.
We are not likely
to resolve problems of international proportions here this semester;
and some of our own local problems remain vexing; but a context
may be helpful a context of where we have been and where
we have come, a context of who we are and what we believe.
*
* *
First, some
facts and indicators and projections about the "State"
of our University:
The most apparent indicator of overall institutional strength is
the University's ability to attract and retain students. And for
the 37th year out of SVSU's 38-year history, fall semester enrollment
exceeded the previous year's this time by about 4%. This
winter semester's enrollment was 3.7% greater than that of winter,
2001.
The
enrollment of international students continues to increase, reaching
a total of 383 students this past semester. These students come
from 50 different countries and they contribute in a variety of
ways to this increasingly cosmopolitan campus. They are wonderfully
generous in sharing their cultures especially their food
but we have still not yet taken full advantage of what they
bring to our campus.
We have the
responsibility to both teach and demonstrate understanding between
peoples of diverse backgrounds and cultures. And never has the need
to teach and demonstrate understanding been more critical.
Sixty students
of Middle-eastern origin are on this campus, and one can only imagine
how conspicuous they felt in recent months. But with only a very
few ugly exceptions, they report that our domestic students as well
as faculty and staff have offered friendship and, if anything, a
heightened sensitivity to their well-being.
Nothing else that happened during the past semester made me more
proud.
"Presidential
Scholars" are those students who were either valedictorian
or salutatorian of their high school graduating class. This past
fall 60 Presidential Scholars entered this University. In addition,
this past fall more than 32% of our first-year students had earned
a grade point average of 3.5 or higher in their high school studies.
The current
Plan still calls for overall enrollment growth at a compounded rate
of 3% peryear, reaching some 10,000 students by the year 2005.
International
students presently account for approximately 4% of total enrollment,
though this anticipated growth may well slow as federal immigration
policies become more restrictive.
It was projected there would be 1,500 students living on the campus
by 2005, and this goal was achieved this past fall.
Finally, it
also sets targets of 75 Presidential Scholars and 35% of the entering
freshman class with a 3.5 GPA or higher. We are on or ahead of schedule
with respect to these goals.
The
University also continues to grow and develop and re-develop its
principal asset the faculty and staff. We are in the midst
of a change of fairly dramatic proportions more than 57.5%
of our full-time faculty have served this institution for less than
ten years. Changes in our professional staffing have been equally
dramatic. Virtually all of our academic departments and administrative
offices have been refreshed with the addition of new talent; on
the other hand we risk significant loss of institutional memory
in the near future. And there are things worth remembering.
There are a
number of additional indicators of institutional strength. Last
semester a "student satisfaction survey" asked 3,300 of
our students if they agreed with various statements. On some otherwise
disagreeable day in February you may wish to remember these appreciative
responses:
- Satisfied
with Quality of Instruction: 77.75%
- Faculty available
after class/during office hours: 93.08%
- Commitment
to academic excellence: 84.88%
- Students
made to feel welcome: 90.70%
- Campus staff
are helpful: 91.8%
- Adequate
parking spaces: 45.14%
Well, most responses
were appreciative.
Two other data sets which offer glimpses into the development of
our institution bear mentioning.
First, we have made a significant investment in technological infrastructure
over the past few years both in terms of equipment and support
personnel. One aspect of this investment has been the regular cycling
of computers for faculty. Over the past few years 161 new computers
have been assigned to faculty, and it is expected that for many
if not most faculty, new computing equipment will be allocated every
three or four years.
It may also
surprise you, as it did me, to learn that more than 65% of our resident
students have computers in their rooms.
As is obvious
from this chart, how we teach and learn and communicate with one
another has changed in consequential ways over the past few years.
This may be another sign of academic and organizational health
though it is useful to bear in mind that while our reliance on technology
is increasing relentlessly the critical issues in teaching and learning
are and always will be primarily social, not technological.
Second, endowment
growth over the past decade has permitted us to create six endowed
chairs, visiting artists and scholars programs, a variety of lectureships
and other special events, and provide tens of thousands of dollars
for student fellowships and scholarships.
Endowment income
does not generate a huge sum of money relative to our overall institutional
expenditures, but it does support creative programs and qualitative
improvements that would otherwise be unaffordable. We are deeply
grateful to all of those including faculty and staff
who made this endowment growth possible.
Home
| Next
|