New tailgating rules will increase problems

submitted by Adam Cushman

November 14, 2005 —

The classification of "beer pong" as a drinking game is not an accurate one. In any atmosphere where any form of alcohol is involved a structured level of organization is required. "Centralized activity games" provide this organization for both participants and spectators. When there are no "central activity games" students are more apt to drink from boredom rather than because of any other reason. Boredom and alcohol can cause a very disruptive and destructive atmosphere.

An average beer pong match may last approximately 15 minutes and at most a single player will drink one alcoholic beverage. In most cases the game is so popular that a number of individuals wait in line to play the game.

With this rationale one could assume that if an individual gets to the tailgate at 9 a.m. and plays three games of beer pong they will at most consume three alcoholic beverages in three hours of tailgating. It is irrational, and unnecessary to ban all "central activity games" from tailgating.

Individuals should be dealt with on a case-to-case basis. Those who are obviously abusing the substance should be ticketed accordingly. It is quite easy for a trained law enforcement individual to spot someone who is "drunk" and acting irresponsibly. The canceling of "central activity games" could also potentially cause more problems in the community around the University as well. It is a fact that more people will be tailgating at their homes and not at the Ryder parking lot. This could quite potentially result in greater incidence of drunk driving, which is something that nobody likes to see.

If it is the view of the University that these "central activity games" are irresponsible and wrong, my question to them would be why it is that parents and grandparents of students and players also come out and enjoy these games with the students in a harmonious, fun, and safe atmosphere?

Adam Cushman student